On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Nathan Wallwork wrote:
> > Consensus Point VIII: Jargon
> >
> > The Linux Professional Institute will not explicitly test on knowledge of
> > jargon and acronyms. The examinees are supposed to be familiar with
> > concepts that have a commonly used acronym for a name (e.g. TCP/IP) but
> > the actual meaning of the letters will not be asked for. The tests will
> > be developed to be free of jargon, abbreviations and acronyms where
> > possible.
>
> Is that wise? Do we really want to say we will write
> "Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol" everywhere we might
> otherwise have used "TCP/IP"?
No, that is not my intention and I thought it says so in the text of the
consensus point. If this is unclear, please suggest another formulation.
--
#>!$!%(@^%#%*(&(#@#*$^@^$##*#@&(%)@**$!(&!^(#((#&%!)%*@)(&$($$%(@#)&*!^$)^@*^@)
Tom "thriving on chaos" Peters
NL-1062 KD nr 149 tel. 31-204080204
Amsterdam e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
