On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> At 06:02 PM 7/25/99 -0400, Richard Rager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Well I took it an got a 3.3.
> >
> >
> >I not a bad test at all. It is one of the best I have seen so far.
>
> Hmmm, well, I took the test as well, and scored 4.53, which they claimed
> was better than 96% of test takers ...
>
> Now, when I took the test, I felt that I answered many of them incorrectly,
> so I am mystified why I scored so highly.
>
Well they got me with the X questions. I do not use X hardly at all.
I know the real basics but some of the stuff I just did not run in to yet.
What happen is the test changes if you miss a subject it give you more on
that subject.
There was very little of command line. Also I do not believe it the
editing question on the command line.
Example:
I have type two keys to fix my mistake. What where they.
$ cat my.txt > /dev/tyt
to
$ cat my.txt > /dev/tty
I do not understand how that make me a better admin. Also more gnu stuff
why?
> In addition, I felt that some of the questions were poorly written, but it
> was hard to capture them.
I was saying it was the best I have seen so far. I do agree that some of
the question could use some work. I also am having trouble because I do
not know what I missed. With out that knownage I can no see why I miss
it. So I do not know if the test question where graded right. Unlike the
sair sample test.
>
> Since I took a free test, it seems like they won't allow me to load the
> test result up into my public area as well :-(
>
I took it free and my test result are in the public area. I also too
the C test. I got 2.36 now that test has some poorly written code.
If I wrote code like that I would not have a job or maybe I would be
working for MS. :-)
Enjoy,
Richard
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
