On 20 Jun, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
>>On 18 Jun, Neil wrote:
>> > and what do u hav against the qpl??? i hav read it... it seems pretty
>> reasonable 2 me!!!
>
> QPL is reasonable. So is MS EULA. All licences are, in themselves.
>
> The KDE problem is that QPL and GPL conflict, and that KDE was released
> under GPL.
I wish it had ended there. Troll Tech asked for review of
license by GNU guys ( only to get into limelight ) and very little
changes were made close to none
--
ScreenSaver? cat /dev/mem
IDE? cat >foo
Sound Player? cat foo.wav >/dev/audio
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-delhi/
