On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Thomas Michalka wrote:
> No, it does by no means or would it make any sense?
> I say: no. Read the manpage:
I have read it several times, fornt- and backwards, and I say: YES! ;-)
<-- man-page cut -->
With all regards to your theory, but this would mean for
e.g. impulse 320,340,20
that diald would shut down the link after:
a. keeping the link up for a minimum of 320 seconds, then proceed to
b. waiting for 340 seconds (secondary-duration) and finally
c. checking if the link is idle in the next 20 seconds (fuzz).
So, the first idle check would be after 320+340=660 seconds!
Now, I've run a test:
For me, diald shut down the link after about 335 seconds if the link is
idle. Just a couple of seconds before initial-duration + fuzz (320+20)
time out. However, there should not anything such as initial+fuzz...
Can you explain this behaviour by reading the man-page?
Well, I cannot.
Regards, Walter
--
Walter Haidinger, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
Address: Brunnerstr.6, A-3108 St.P�lten, Austria. Tel.: +43-2742-257191
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
