At 07:44 PM 7/1/99 +0100, Ralph Clark wrote:
>So if you have second thoughts I'd suggest plain diald-0.99. It had less important
>faults as far as usability is concerned.
>
>Oh - I should have mentionedl; my SuSE 6.1 distro is using glibc 2.0.7. That is
>surely significant. What libc have you got?
>
I'm using glibc 2.1.1... Since you encouraged trying 0.99, I did that
and had the same problem.  But since I was trying older versions anyhow,
I also tried 0.98.3.  Since it worked, I have to conclude that there
is something broken in the implementation of run_shell since it doesn't
seem to completely replace fork_dialer.


--------------------

Stefen Boyd
__         
| \        ____        
|_/_       |
|   \      |__
|___/oyd   |
           |___nterprises
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(408)739-BOYD
(408)481-9658 (fax)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to