Stefen Boyd wrote:
> I'm using glibc 2.1.1... Since you encouraged trying 0.99, I did that
> and had the same problem. But since I was trying older versions anyhow,
> I also tried 0.98.3. Since it worked, I have to conclude that there
> is something broken in the implementation of run_shell since it doesn't
> seem to completely replace fork_dialer.
I think you have to look at glibc here too. Remember, it's working fine on my system.
As it's not been universally adopted Mike Jagdis may not have tested with it. I know
it contains some fairly major changes compared to glibc 2.0.x.
In any event you should cc Mike. He usually takes a few days to respond even at the
best of times. This is a fairly busy mailing list and he's obviously a fairly busy guy
- if you don't address your bug directly to him he may not even notice your posting.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ralph Clark, Virgo Solutions Ltd (UK)
__ _
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ * Powerful * Flexible * Compatible * Reliable *
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / *Well Supported * Thousands of New Users Every Day*
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ The Cost Effective Choice - Linux Means Business!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
