On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:13:32PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> The motivation behind this patch is to make private namespaces more
> accessible by allowing their creation at mount/bind time.
> 
> Based on some of the FUSE permissions discussions, I wanted to check
> into modifying the mount system calls -- adding a flag which created a
> new namespace for the resulting mount.  I quickly discovered that what
> I typically wanted (for the case of running a mount command) was to
> actually create a new namespace for the parent thread (typically the
> shell), inherit that namespace, and then perform the mount.
> 
> Its not clear to me that both options are needed, cloning the parent's
> namespace seems to be what you want most of the time.
> 
> In order to minimize code impact I split the copy_namespace function,
> perhaps the right long term solution is to change it's interface to
> accommodate the changes.  Things look a bit more invasive as I moved
> the copy_namespace function above do_mount.  The patch follows:

*UGH*

So what happens to those who happen to share task->fs with the parent?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to