On 2006-05-20T10:51:53, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you implying that the only part affected is the LRM? > > There are a couple of things that surprise me about this. > > If you leave the name spaces mingled in the GUI (and the CIB, > presumably), then the name space clashes will still happen.
He's not suggesting that. This is about storing the meta attributes not within the "attributes" element within the instance_attributes, but within a new "meta_attributes". > If you put conversion logic in place that automatically converts from > the old form to the new form, then the current names are still reserved > - it's just not as obvious. This could be turned off after the setup has been sanitized, or automatically (as Andrew suggests, when the first meta_attributes section is seen for a resource). > If you wrote an external conversion script that you could run on a > one-shot basis, then that would be helpful - but wouldn't be the right > thing to do until a cluster was completely converted over to the new > names (and you'd hope you don't have to fail over in this interval). Right, a script to do this conversion could be done. > "What you're going to do, do quickly" (Jn 13:27). Because the longer > this drags on, the worse the problem will be. > > This is _exactly_ the kind of thing you'd like to have settled by the > time of a major release - so that the legacy problems will be minimal. Thanks for your guidance on this matter after the fact ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/