On 2006-08-08T13:25:48, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PLEASE APPLY A FIX like this before shipping 2.0.7.
>
> (Slightly deeper: why call `ha_parameter crm` twice? Wouldn't it be better
> to call once, save the result, and then use that result twice?)
Actually, that test is the only user of CheckBool. I've taken the
liberty to rename this to CrmEnabled and put the additional check into
that function.
The tag for 2.0.7 has been moved. Does this work for you?
Sincerely,
Lars
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
