On 2008-02-04T21:59:44, Tadashiro Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand Andrew will release Pacemaker, and Alan will release
> Heartbeat, individually.
>
> Now we are standing on a starting point of this discussion ;-)
>
> Someone should testify the combination of these packages in the same
> way as Heartbeat+CRM used to be done. I think volunteer testers in
> the community had better to do it as well as Andrew does it. If so, we
> should share the set of combination of these packages for testing.
>
> Pacemaker project gathers volunteers to test Heartbeat+Pacemaker.
> Heartbeat project gathers volunteers too. Therefore, two groups for
> testing are needed.
>
> That is what I wanted say, power of the community will be divided.
>
> Is it correct?
No, this is not correct. Please stop repeating that, and I don't
understand how you get that impression.
Testing Pacemaker involves testing it on top of the cluster
infrastructure (ie, heartbeat and openAIS). It is almost impossible to
test Pacemaker sensibly w/o a cluster stack underneath.
The testing effort will not be divided.
There is no duplication of testing effort.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
