Hi Dejan, > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > What is your opinion?
When we use logd, ocf_log functions well. However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd. We advance to the direction that does not use logd now. If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql. > > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest edition. > > > > This is a practice result of select now(). > > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now ------------------------------ > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09 > > (1 row) > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now ------------------------------- > > 2010-08-17 > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row) > > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > What is your opinion? > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
