Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comment.
> > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
>
> I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
When we do not use logd, all log is output.
* We use logfacility without using logd.
(snip)
if
[ -n "$HA_LOGFACILITY" ]
then
: logging through syslog
# loglevel is unknown, use 'notice' for now
loglevel=notice
case "${*}" in
*ERROR*) loglevel=err;;
*WARN*) loglevel=warning;;
*INFO*|info) loglevel=info;;
esac
logger -t "$HA_LOGTAG" -p ${HA_LOGFACILITY}.${loglevel} "${*}" --->
this
fi
(snip)
> > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
>
> Why is that?
In fact, we always used the script which confirmed survival of logd.
However, we decided to abolish survival monitor of this logd this time.
And it was decided that the log went by way of a syslog.
> Let's hope we get some input from others too.
All right.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > >
> > > What is your opinion?
> >
> > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
>
> I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
>
> > However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd.
> >
> > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
>
> Why is that?
>
> > If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy.
>
> Let's hope we get some input from others too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> >
> > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql.
> > > >
> > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest
> > > > edition.
> > > >
> > > > This is a practice result of select now().
> > > >
> > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09
> > > > (1 row)
> > > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now
> > > > ------------------------------- 2010-08-17
> > > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row)
> > > >
> > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor.
> > > >
> > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet.
> > >
> > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > >
> > > What is your opinion?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dejan
> > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________
> > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
