Hi Serge, Hi Lars, Hi Dejan, Thank you for an opinion.
I think it to be good with an option of ocf_run. An option will be useful in future. To Dejan : About this matter, do we wait for the opinion of other people a little more? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Serge Dubrouski <serge...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm in a complete agreement with Lars. Instead of creating new > function runasowner_for_monitor() inside an RA, and pgsql probably not > the only case of "too much logging", I'd rather introduce a new option > for ocf_run. > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@novell.com> wrote: > > On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > >> I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > >> > >> With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > > > Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the > > script - but the lrmd might still catch it. > > > > In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to > > ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. > > > > > > Regards, > > � �Lars > > > > -- > > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg) > > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > -- > Serge Dubrouski. > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
