Nah just different decisions of design, either way as mentioned given that your RA covers the whole daemon better I think it makes sense to move ahead on it, I'll give it a spin next week.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dominik Klein <d...@in-telegence.net> wrote: >> Maybe I just don't understand it, but isn't that broken? > > Jon and I just talked on IRC and my misunderstanding was that he > intended to _start_ conntrackd via an init script and have the cluster > only do the cache commiting/flushing and monitoring work. > > So from a cluster configuration point of view, conntrackd would only run > on one node at a time, no clone resources at all. > > I want to say "my bad" but I'm not too sure I was all wrong here :) > > Dominik > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
