Hi Hideo-san, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:32:05AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > I agree to your patch.
Thank you for the reply. BTW, the monitor was shamelessly stolen from Vladislav. Applied. ocft test passed (after some struggle and eventually fixing the ocft source). Cheers, Dejan > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > --- On Thu, 2012/4/5, Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use > > of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the > > issue elsewhere and I don't see any point in keeping > > vgck/vgdisplay given that they don't result in better monitoring > > under normal circumstances. And if the circumstances are such > > that the new monitoring fails, I think that there'll be many > > more problems on the node than a failed volume group. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dejan > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
