Hi Dejan, I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out validate-all. I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to make only the check of the parameter simply.
How do you think? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2012/4/6, Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:32:05AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > > > I agree to your patch. > > Thank you for the reply. > > BTW, the monitor was shamelessly stolen from Vladislav. > > Applied. > > ocft test passed (after some struggle and eventually fixing the > ocft source). > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- On Thu, 2012/4/5, Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use > > > of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the > > > issue elsewhere and I don't see any point in keeping > > > vgck/vgdisplay given that they don't result in better monitoring > > > under normal circumstances. And if the circumstances are such > > > that the new monitoring fails, I think that there'll be many > > > more problems on the node than a failed volume group. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
