On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:24:40AM -0700, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> check existence of instance number in replication mode
> because Pacemaker 1.1.8 or higher do not append instance numbers.
I think this is wrong.
It seems this became "necessary" because of
commit 427c7fe6ea94a566aaa714daf8d214290632f837
Author: Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>
Date: Fri Jul 13 13:37:42 2012 +1000
High: PE: Do not append instance numbers to anonymous clones
Benefits:
- they shouldnt have been exposed in the first place, but I didnt know how
not to back then
- if admins don't know what they are, they can't be misunderstood or misused
- more reliable failcount and promotion scores (since you dont have to
check for all possible permutations)
- smaller status section since there cant be entries for each possible :N
suffix
- the name in the config corresponds to the resource in the logs
So if pgsql thinks it needs these instance numbers,
maybe it is not so "anonymous" a clone, after all?
Would the existing resource agent work with globally-unique=true ?
Lars
>
> You can merge this Pull Request by running:
>
> git pull https://github.com/t-matsuo/resource-agents check-instance-number
>
> Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/159
>
> -- Commit Summary --
>
> * Low: pgsql: check existence of instance number in replication mode
>
> -- File Changes --
>
> M heartbeat/pgsql (44)
>
> -- Patch Links --
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/159.patch
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/159.diff
>
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/159
--
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
