Hi,

On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Helmut Weymann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Montag, 8. März 2010 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay and thanks for the reminder.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:25:05AM +0100, Helmut Weymann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:23:17AM +0100, Helmut Weymann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > Well, if that's the only way, let's have it like that. Perhaps
> > > > > also to allow for a host-port map file, which would be preferable
> > > > > if for instance ports 7 and 8 are used. Though that file could be
> > > > > a maintenance issue, with csync2 or rsync it could be kept in
> > > > > good shape.
> > > > >
> > > > > The parameter hostlist should be renamed to port_map or similar.
> > > >
> > > > Actually not, hostlist is better.
> > > >
> > > > A few more suggestions:
> > > >
> > > > - you could allow for "empty" slots other values apart from NULL
> > > >   (say "N" or "X")
> > >
> > > Managed to get a list from the device via the web-interface.
> >
> > Great!
> >
> > > Nevertheless I still allow to define the parameter hostlist.
> >
> > Probably not a bad idea, in case the device is used to manage
> > more than just this cluster.
> >
> > > Names used in that list are only used if CRM requests to kill a
> > > cluster-node. (thats my guess.)  So any name should be allowed. Only the
> > > names of cluster nodes should make a difference.
> >
> > It would make sense to also check if the names in the given
> > hostlist are available for management at the device.
> >
> > > Please review the attached submission. It includes:
> > > - external/ippower9258 (the plugin in bin folder)
> > > - README.ippower9258 in doc folder.
> > >
> > > As an addon I have included in folder doc/example the relevant html-files
> > > the device creates.
> >
> > Thanks, that was helpful.
> >
> > > I have marked a few lines of the plugin with the comment "please review".
> > > These are about loglevels supported by ha_log.sh, pathnames below
> > > /var/run/heartbeat/rsctmp and a piece of code between the lines 233 to
> > > 263.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to make any adjustments. I'll run the necessary tests.
> >
> > You'll find a patch attached. It contains the following changes:
> >
> > - different build_hostlist procedure based on output of w3m -dump
> > - exit on error in get_*_from_device
> > - a few other minor changes
> I did apply your patch and tested the new plugin with the stonith command.
> The different tests, did what they were expected to do: got the hostlist, 
> status was confirmed, port status was under control.
> Just when I used a wrong hostname the error message printed each hostname 
> from 
> the list on a separate line. - I hope this is just about nice output.

Most probably.

> As we no longer need the devicename it is superfluous to get DEVICE_SETTINGS.
> I will remove that code including the corresponding error handling.

OK. Missed that part.

> > BTW, if you could leave out most of {} around variable
> > references, that'd make my eyes less wobble.
> I'm completely new to shell scripting. Do you have any hint on when to use 
> these {} bracket pairs? Nevertheless give me a few days to remove the 
> brackets 
> and have the outcome tested.

It must be used if the following context could be part of the
variable name, such as ${var}123. Otherwise, it can be safely
removed.

Thanks,

Dejan


> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> > > > - take out the documentation part (comments at the top of the
> > > >   file) and put it in a separate README file (README.ippower9258)
> > >
> > > Done
> > >
> > > > - please make the indentation consistent, sometimes there are
> > > >   spaces, sometime tabs
> > >
> > > Done.
> > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Dejan
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Helmut
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to