Ok, thanks, I am using heartbeat 2.1.3 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
And i using crm respaw, i guess it uses peacemaker. crm_mon and etc. So, i guess you are saying that is possible to do what i want, using constraint. Can you give me a litle more information about suject ? Maybe some where i can find man and stuff ? I will try add this But i am not quite sure what you said. So i have to add an location containind my resource ? How do i make this Count ? i am not to familiared with peacemaker. Thanks. []'sf.rique On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm>wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:37:50AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote: > > When i set heartbeat to do bcast in some interface, it does ok. > > > > But if i set to do bcast in 2 interfaces, it does ok also, the problem > is, i > > want the heartbeat give up resoucers if it looses just one interface... > it > > does not do this, it just issue an info saying that the other link is > down. > > > > Does any one can help me ? > > > > So just to be clear, i want to heartbeat check on 2 diferents interfaces > > eth0 and eth1, and if it loses connections in one of the interfaces, it > give > > up resources or shutdown etc.. > > > > As i am doing now it doe snothing, and i can get it to do. > > > > > > I am trying to make three ldiretord in HA, but it receves connections > from > > internet on eth0 and redirect them in eth1 ( intranet ) > > The point is, if any interface goes down, my service does not work. So i > > need it to give up resources. > > > > Sorry about my english! > > NP, you make yourself perfectly understandable. > > The point of having more than one interface is exactly that > heartbeat can continue. It has nothing to do with resources. > > If you're using pacemaker (not sure how would it work with > heartbeat v1), you can use a ping RA and specify two hosts > independently reachable over the two interfaces and make a > location constraint which would move a resource if the count of > reachable hosts is less than 2. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Thankss!! > > > > > > []'sf.rique > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
