Look, i am not getting it to work.

I already made a pingd conective clone in all nodes. But now i can not get
an location to work.

Can you help me ?

I set an constraint > location > Conectivity and this has resource, my
loadbalancer group resources, The score is - infinity and the atribute is my
pingd clone with operator less than value. And my pingd need both
conectivity working so the score is same as value.

any help ?



[]'sf.rique


On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Henrique Fernandes <sf.ri...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Here where i work, we try to use the distro release package, and the on
> centos is this version. =/
>
> But thanks, i am gonna ready it now.
>
> []'sf.rique
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic 
> <deja...@fastmail.fm>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:18AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
>> > Ok, thanks,
>> >
>> > I am using heartbeat 2.1.3 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
>>
>> Oh, please upgrade as soon as you can, version 2.1.3 is quite old
>> and you won't get much support for it. Pacemaker is what used to
>> be heartbeat v2. There's an upgrade documentation at
>> http://www.linux-ha.org/doc/
>>
>> > And i using crm respaw, i guess it uses peacemaker. crm_mon and etc.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > So, i guess you are saying that is possible to do what i want, using
>> > constraint.
>> >
>> > Can you give me a litle more information about suject ? Maybe some where
>> i
>> > can find man and stuff ?
>> >
>> > I will try add this But i am not quite sure what you said.
>> >
>> > So i have to add an location containind my resource ? How do i make this
>> > Count ? i am not to familiared with peacemaker.
>>
>> Hmm, not sure if it's really a peacemaker ;->
>>
>> There's documentation for a Pacemaker release which corresponds
>> to Heartbeat v2.1.x
>>
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/mwiki/images/7/7d/Configuration_Explained_0.6.pdf
>>
>> But please consider upgrading.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dejan
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > []'sf.rique
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <
>> deja...@fastmail.fm>wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:37:50AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
>> > > > When i set heartbeat to do bcast in some interface, it does ok.
>> > > >
>> > > > But if i set to do bcast in 2 interfaces, it does ok also, the
>> problem
>> > > is, i
>> > > > want the heartbeat give up resoucers if it looses just one
>> interface...
>> > > it
>> > > > does not do this, it just issue an info saying that the other link
>> is
>> > > down.
>> > > >
>> > > > Does any one can help me ?
>> > > >
>> > > > So just to be clear, i want to heartbeat check on 2 diferents
>> interfaces
>> > > > eth0 and eth1, and if it loses connections in one of the interfaces,
>> it
>> > > give
>> > > > up resources or shutdown etc..
>> > > >
>> > > > As i am doing now it doe snothing, and i can get it to do.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I am trying to make three ldiretord in HA, but it receves
>> connections
>> > > from
>> > > > internet on eth0 and redirect them in eth1 ( intranet )
>> > > > The point is, if any interface goes down, my service does not work.
>> So i
>> > > > need it to give up resources.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry about my english!
>> > >
>> > > NP, you make yourself perfectly understandable.
>> > >
>> > > The point of having more than one interface is exactly that
>> > > heartbeat can continue. It has nothing to do with resources.
>> > >
>> > > If you're using pacemaker (not sure how would it work with
>> > > heartbeat v1), you can use a ping RA and specify two hosts
>> > > independently reachable over the two interfaces and make a
>> > > location constraint which would move a resource if the count of
>> > > reachable hosts is less than 2.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Dejan
>> > >
>> > > > Thankss!!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > []'sf.rique
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Linux-HA mailing list
>> > > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Linux-HA mailing list
>> > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Linux-HA mailing list
>> > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to