On 2011-07-08 15:23, Warnke, Eric E wrote:
> 
> If the fork bomb is preventing the system from spawning a health check, it
> would seem like the most intelligent course of action would be to presume
> that it failed and act accordingly.

Here we go again. Since the original poster did not address the
following question of mine, maybe you are inclined to:

> Now please define how exactly Pacemaker would be handling this
> "accordingly."

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to