Failing to spawn a check should be the same as a check failing. -Eric
On 7/11/11 3:38 AM, "Florian Haas" <florian.h...@linbit.com> wrote: >On 2011-07-08 15:23, Warnke, Eric E wrote: >> >> If the fork bomb is preventing the system from spawning a health check, >>it >> would seem like the most intelligent course of action would be to >>presume >> that it failed and act accordingly. > >Here we go again. Since the original poster did not address the >following question of mine, maybe you are inclined to: > >> Now please define how exactly Pacemaker would be handling this >> "accordingly." > >Florian > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
