On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, RaSca <ra...@miamammausalinux.org> wrote:
> Il giorno Mar 20 Set 2011 17:54:58 CEST, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
> [...]
>>> And I completely agree with this, but in an environment like mine, where
>>> a single resource failure might involve all the others (with fence) is
>>> wronk to keep this kind of settings. Do you agree with me?
>> No. If the resource cannot stop, then something's wrong either
>> with the resource or with the RA. And needs to be fixed.
>
> And this is for sure. But I cannot make all resources on a node stop and
> migrate (because of fence) just because one of them has failed.
> Those resources are not connected one to each other, so it is more
> reasonable to keep the survived resources alive, or at least live
> migrating them (on-fail=standby) to the other node and THEN reboot the
> first one.
>
> [...]
>> If a resource fails to stop, then on-fail="stop" cannot possibly
>> help. Furthermore, you basically make this resource less
>> available (the cluster won't try to recover it). Must be that
>> I'm missing something.
>> At any rate, I don't think that you need to fiddle with the
>> on-fail attribute, but see what's wrong with the RA or libvirt
>> or the combination of the two.
>> Thanks,
>> Dejan
>
> Then my question is why the attribute on-fail was created? I repeat, I
> totally agree with the fact that there are some problems with the RA but
> until I find out exactly what's wrong I had to take care of all my
> cluster's resources and so the most reasonable thing is to keep one
> single failed vm stopped.

you probably want on-fail=block or on-fail=ignore until you figure out
the problem.

>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> RaSca
> Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene!
> ra...@miamammausalinux.org
> http://www.miamammausalinux.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to