>>> Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 14:41 in >>> Nachricht <CAPUexz9y557445CW=elti2qyx9ggxmfp8q5wxsjiad5i4oc...@mail.gmail.com>: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >>>>> Florian Haas <florian.h...@hastexo.com> schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35 in > > Nachricht <4ecf99ae.8050...@hastexo.com>: > > > > [...] > >> ... and I just morphed that patch into a git branch. Ulrich, as much as > >> we're all grateful for contributions to resource agents, _please_ don't > >> mix functional modification with "cleanup" such as whitespace > >> modifications. It makes the review awfully tedious. > > > > I know, but inconsistend indentation should have been fixed before > releasing. Anyway, did you try option "-b" or "-w"? > > :) > > Sending a uuencoded everything-rolled-into-one patch and then starting > about what others should "fix before releasing" is a great example of > self-ironic humor. I like that. Thanks! Made my day.
Hi! I believe that bad code is still bad code even if nicely packaged, just as good code is good code, especially when transported binary-safe over E-Mail. I really don't see why anybody working with a UNIX system cannot uudecode the code. Even vi can do it. At least you had your fun. Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
