>>> Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 15:05 in >>> Nachricht <capuexz9bm3suof0fteqvbjcpyo9rlz9gazk3mc5td8oyosi...@mail.gmail.com>: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> > wrote: > >> Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism. > >> So > what's wrong with local variables? > > > > local is almost certainly not a bashism. At least I can recall > > once changing typeset to local in some RA. > > IIRC, then "local foo=bar" is a bashism, whereas "local foo; foo=bar" > is POSIX compliant. At least that's what checkbashisms seems to > indicate.
Hmmm: HP-UX POSIX Shell uses "typeset -i e=0", and I always thought that's just POSIX. Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
