by "shell" , you mean the crm api ?
if so , where could I get the stand-alone release ?
Thanks again
Alain
De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>
A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>
Date : 30/07/2012 08:30
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered
resources as described in Pacemaker doc ?
Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote:
> Hi Andrew
> sorry but I don't understand what you mean by "the stand-alone version
of
> the shell" ?
The shell is now a separate project.
> Thanks
> Alain
>
>
>
> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>
> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>
> Date : 30/07/2012 05:59
> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered
> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ?
> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote:
>> I've found in the mailing-list messages the syntax I could have written
>> with crm configure edit , something like :
>> order order-g-FS inf: ( fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E ) ( exportfs-fs-A
>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E )
>> right ?
>> But with my pacemaker release , crm configure edit returns a syntax
> error
>> around the first "("
>> so I think it is not supported with my release 1.1.5-5 , right ?
>
> You probably want to be using the stand-alone version of the shell.
> Its likely to be far more up-to-date than the bundled one.
>
>>
>> Thanks for confirmation.
>> Regards
>> Alain
>>
>>
>>
>> De : alain.mou...@bull.net
>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>
>> Date : 27/07/2012 12:47
>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered
>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ?
>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> OK for mount of FS , that's not the real thing which matters for me,
>> but I'm quite sure that the parallelisation of exportfs stop, when the
>> OCF_RESKEY_wait_for_leasetime is set, is
>> valuable and even quite mandatory, as I do not want to add the sleep of
>> the 5 exportfs even with a reduced value
>> for the wait_for_leastime which is 90s by default. I would like to set
> it
>> to around 10s, but in parallel for the 5 exportfs.
>> Without paralleization, NFS clients will for sure get timeouts before
> the
>> end of migration of the FS and exportfs resource group.
>>
>> Anyway, my question was more about the configuration of 6.6 example
than
>> the behavior of server nfs in HA ... ;-)
>>
>> Regards
>> Alain
>>
>>
>>
>> De : "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
>> A : <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>
>> Date : 27/07/2012 11:47
>> Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered
>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ?
>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> While your idea sounds good, I doubt whether parallel mounts being
tried
>> are actually being performed in parallel, just as the exportfs
> operations.
>>
>> They all access some common data structures in the kernel, I guess. In
>> that case, the timeout values may need adjustments.
>>
>> Despite of that some RAs may show amazing behavior if executed in
> parallel
>>
>> (I guess) ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ulrich
>>
>>>>> <alain.mou...@bull.net> schrieb am 27.07.2012 um 09:15 in Nachricht
>> <of7cf1dd89.6edcc5c6-onc1257a48.0025bf70-c1257a48.0027c...@bull.net>:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> For now I had a group with several Filesystem resources followed by
the
>>> exportfs like this :
>>> group g-FS-EXPORTED fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E exportfs-fs-A
>>
>>
>>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E \
>>>
>>> Now, I would like to have all the FS mounted before all the exportfs
> BUT
>>
>>
>>> with sequential=false for all Filesystem primitives and
> sequential=false
>>
>>
>>> also for all exportfs primitives.
>>>
>>> I saw in the Pacemaker Configuration Explained documentation the
>>> Example 6.11. Ordered sets of unordered resources
>>> with two ressources A & B starting in parallel and before two
> ressources
>>
>> C
>>> & D starting also starting in parallel. I think this
>>> is exactly what I need.
>>>
>>> But :
>>>
>>> 1/ I have to remove the group configuration g-FS-EXPORTED , right ?
>>> or could I have such constraints "inside" the group itself ?
>>> (based on documentation, I don't think so)
>>>
>>> 2/ How can I enter the ordered set of unordered resources in the
>>> configuration ?
>>> (in documentation, the examples are given in xml, whereas we can't
>> edit
>>> the xml cib file,
>>> and in crm configure order, I can't see the way to do it :
>>> usage: order <id> score-type: <first-rsc>[:<action>]
>>> <then-rsc>[:<action>] [symmetrical=<bool>]
>>>
>>> 3/ After this configuration, that means that I can't manage the start
> or
>>
>>
>>> stop of all these resources with only one command
>>> as it was the case with the group ? meaning that I have to launch
> a
>>
>>
>>> start command on the 10 primitives ? instead of
>>> the start command on the group ?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help on this.
>>> Alain
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
