On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: > Hi > OK thanks I 'll look for the last release of crm command ... > But one thing I don't understand : the "Ordering sets of resources" > configuration is described > in my old Pacemaker Configuration Explained 1.0.5" , so if the crm > delivered with Pacemaker > on RH does not support this,
It was there but broken > that means that there was another way to > enter this type of configuration ? > Or perhaps that nobody has needed yet this type of sets ordering ? (Which > would be strange ...) > Alain > > > > De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> > A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> > Date : 01/08/2012 00:25 > Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered > resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? > Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:39 AM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've looked for a crm standalone rpm on github/clusterlabs, but >> unsuccessfully ... >> Could somebody here give me a clue ? ;-) > > Go to: > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/ > > And look for the section titled "Important information about the crm > shell" > >> >> Thanks >> Alain >> >> >> >> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> >> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >> Date : 30/07/2012 10:23 >> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >>> by "shell" , you mean the crm api ? >> >> I mean the bit that looks like: >> >> crm configure ... >> >>> >>> if so , where could I get the stand-alone release ? >> >> I don't recall off the top of my head, there is a link to it from the >> clusterlabs/pacemaker github page. >> >>> >>> Thanks again >>> Alain >>> >>> >>> >>> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> >>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>> Date : 30/07/2012 08:30 >>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >>>> Hi Andrew >>>> sorry but I don't understand what you mean by "the stand-alone > version >>> of >>>> the shell" ? >>> >>> The shell is now a separate project. >>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Alain >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> >>>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>>> Date : 30/07/2012 05:59 >>>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of > unordered >>>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >>>>> I've found in the mailing-list messages the syntax I could have >> written >>>>> with crm configure edit , something like : >>>>> order order-g-FS inf: ( fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E ) ( exportfs-fs-A >>>>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E ) >>>>> right ? >>>>> But with my pacemaker release , crm configure edit returns a syntax >>>> error >>>>> around the first "(" >>>>> so I think it is not supported with my release 1.1.5-5 , right ? >>>> >>>> You probably want to be using the stand-alone version of the shell. >>>> Its likely to be far more up-to-date than the bundled one. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for confirmation. >>>>> Regards >>>>> Alain >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> De : alain.mou...@bull.net >>>>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>>>> Date : 27/07/2012 12:47 >>>>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of >> unordered >>>>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>>>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> OK for mount of FS , that's not the real thing which matters for me, >>>>> but I'm quite sure that the parallelisation of exportfs stop, when > the >>>>> OCF_RESKEY_wait_for_leasetime is set, is >>>>> valuable and even quite mandatory, as I do not want to add the sleep >> of >>>>> the 5 exportfs even with a reduced value >>>>> for the wait_for_leastime which is 90s by default. I would like to > set >>>> it >>>>> to around 10s, but in parallel for the 5 exportfs. >>>>> Without paralleization, NFS clients will for sure get timeouts before >>>> the >>>>> end of migration of the FS and exportfs resource group. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, my question was more about the configuration of 6.6 example >>> than >>>>> the behavior of server nfs in HA ... ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Alain >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> De : "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> >>>>> A : <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>>>> Date : 27/07/2012 11:47 >>>>> Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >>>>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>>>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> While your idea sounds good, I doubt whether parallel mounts being >>> tried >>>>> are actually being performed in parallel, just as the exportfs >>>> operations. >>>>> >>>>> They all access some common data structures in the kernel, I guess. > In >>>>> that case, the timeout values may need adjustments. >>>>> >>>>> Despite of that some RAs may show amazing behavior if executed in >>>> parallel >>>>> >>>>> (I guess) ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ulrich >>>>> >>>>>>>> <alain.mou...@bull.net> schrieb am 27.07.2012 um 09:15 in > Nachricht >>>>> <of7cf1dd89.6edcc5c6-onc1257a48.0025bf70-c1257a48.0027c...@bull.net>: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> For now I had a group with several Filesystem resources followed by >>> the >>>>>> exportfs like this : >>>>>> group g-FS-EXPORTED fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E > exportfs-fs-A >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E \ >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, I would like to have all the FS mounted before all the exportfs >>>> BUT >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> with sequential=false for all Filesystem primitives and >>>> sequential=false >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> also for all exportfs primitives. >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw in the Pacemaker Configuration Explained documentation the >>>>>> Example 6.11. Ordered sets of unordered resources >>>>>> with two ressources A & B starting in parallel and before two >>>> ressources >>>>> >>>>> C >>>>>> & D starting also starting in parallel. I think this >>>>>> is exactly what I need. >>>>>> >>>>>> But : >>>>>> >>>>>> 1/ I have to remove the group configuration g-FS-EXPORTED , right ? >>>>>> or could I have such constraints "inside" the group itself ? >>>>>> (based on documentation, I don't think so) >>>>>> >>>>>> 2/ How can I enter the ordered set of unordered resources in the >>>>>> configuration ? >>>>>> (in documentation, the examples are given in xml, whereas we > can't >>>>> edit >>>>>> the xml cib file, >>>>>> and in crm configure order, I can't see the way to do it : >>>>>> usage: order <id> score-type: <first-rsc>[:<action>] >>>>>> <then-rsc>[:<action>] [symmetrical=<bool>] >>>>>> >>>>>> 3/ After this configuration, that means that I can't manage the > start >>>> or >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> stop of all these resources with only one command >>>>>> as it was the case with the group ? meaning that I have to >> launch >>>> a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> start command on the 10 primitives ? instead of >>>>>> the start command on the group ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help on this. >>>>>> Alain >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
