Hi OK thanks I 'll look for the last release of crm command ... But one thing I don't understand : the "Ordering sets of resources" configuration is described in my old Pacemaker Configuration Explained 1.0.5" , so if the crm delivered with Pacemaker on RH does not support this, that means that there was another way to enter this type of configuration ? Or perhaps that nobody has needed yet this type of sets ordering ? (Which would be strange ...) Alain
De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> Date : 01/08/2012 00:25 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:39 AM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: > Hi > > I've looked for a crm standalone rpm on github/clusterlabs, but > unsuccessfully ... > Could somebody here give me a clue ? ;-) Go to: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/ And look for the section titled "Important information about the crm shell" > > Thanks > Alain > > > > De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> > A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> > Date : 30/07/2012 10:23 > Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered > resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? > Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org > > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >> by "shell" , you mean the crm api ? > > I mean the bit that looks like: > > crm configure ... > >> >> if so , where could I get the stand-alone release ? > > I don't recall off the top of my head, there is a link to it from the > clusterlabs/pacemaker github page. > >> >> Thanks again >> Alain >> >> >> >> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> >> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >> Date : 30/07/2012 08:30 >> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew >>> sorry but I don't understand what you mean by "the stand-alone version >> of >>> the shell" ? >> >> The shell is now a separate project. >> >>> Thanks >>> Alain >>> >>> >>> >>> De : Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> >>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>> Date : 30/07/2012 05:59 >>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, <alain.mou...@bull.net> wrote: >>>> I've found in the mailing-list messages the syntax I could have > written >>>> with crm configure edit , something like : >>>> order order-g-FS inf: ( fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E ) ( exportfs-fs-A >>>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E ) >>>> right ? >>>> But with my pacemaker release , crm configure edit returns a syntax >>> error >>>> around the first "(" >>>> so I think it is not supported with my release 1.1.5-5 , right ? >>> >>> You probably want to be using the stand-alone version of the shell. >>> Its likely to be far more up-to-date than the bundled one. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for confirmation. >>>> Regards >>>> Alain >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> De : alain.mou...@bull.net >>>> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>>> Date : 27/07/2012 12:47 >>>> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of > unordered >>>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> OK for mount of FS , that's not the real thing which matters for me, >>>> but I'm quite sure that the parallelisation of exportfs stop, when the >>>> OCF_RESKEY_wait_for_leasetime is set, is >>>> valuable and even quite mandatory, as I do not want to add the sleep > of >>>> the 5 exportfs even with a reduced value >>>> for the wait_for_leastime which is 90s by default. I would like to set >>> it >>>> to around 10s, but in parallel for the 5 exportfs. >>>> Without paralleization, NFS clients will for sure get timeouts before >>> the >>>> end of migration of the FS and exportfs resource group. >>>> >>>> Anyway, my question was more about the configuration of 6.6 example >> than >>>> the behavior of server nfs in HA ... ;-) >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Alain >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> De : "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> >>>> A : <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org> >>>> Date : 27/07/2012 11:47 >>>> Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: How to configure ordered sets of unordered >>>> resources as described in Pacemaker doc ? >>>> Envoyé par : linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> While your idea sounds good, I doubt whether parallel mounts being >> tried >>>> are actually being performed in parallel, just as the exportfs >>> operations. >>>> >>>> They all access some common data structures in the kernel, I guess. In >>>> that case, the timeout values may need adjustments. >>>> >>>> Despite of that some RAs may show amazing behavior if executed in >>> parallel >>>> >>>> (I guess) ;-) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ulrich >>>> >>>>>>> <alain.mou...@bull.net> schrieb am 27.07.2012 um 09:15 in Nachricht >>>> <of7cf1dd89.6edcc5c6-onc1257a48.0025bf70-c1257a48.0027c...@bull.net>: >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> For now I had a group with several Filesystem resources followed by >> the >>>>> exportfs like this : >>>>> group g-FS-EXPORTED fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E exportfs-fs-A >>>> >>>> >>>>> exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E \ >>>>> >>>>> Now, I would like to have all the FS mounted before all the exportfs >>> BUT >>>> >>>> >>>>> with sequential=false for all Filesystem primitives and >>> sequential=false >>>> >>>> >>>>> also for all exportfs primitives. >>>>> >>>>> I saw in the Pacemaker Configuration Explained documentation the >>>>> Example 6.11. Ordered sets of unordered resources >>>>> with two ressources A & B starting in parallel and before two >>> ressources >>>> >>>> C >>>>> & D starting also starting in parallel. I think this >>>>> is exactly what I need. >>>>> >>>>> But : >>>>> >>>>> 1/ I have to remove the group configuration g-FS-EXPORTED , right ? >>>>> or could I have such constraints "inside" the group itself ? >>>>> (based on documentation, I don't think so) >>>>> >>>>> 2/ How can I enter the ordered set of unordered resources in the >>>>> configuration ? >>>>> (in documentation, the examples are given in xml, whereas we can't >>>> edit >>>>> the xml cib file, >>>>> and in crm configure order, I can't see the way to do it : >>>>> usage: order <id> score-type: <first-rsc>[:<action>] >>>>> <then-rsc>[:<action>] [symmetrical=<bool>] >>>>> >>>>> 3/ After this configuration, that means that I can't manage the start >>> or >>>> >>>> >>>>> stop of all these resources with only one command >>>>> as it was the case with the group ? meaning that I have to > launch >>> a >>>> >>>> >>>>> start command on the 10 primitives ? instead of >>>>> the start command on the group ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help on this. >>>>> Alain >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
