At 10:20 07-02-99 +1100, you wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 09:54:18AM -0700, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
>> Your right Alan. If I had been upgrading my Linux over the past
>> year with each new 2.1.x then 2.2.0 might not be a big step. But coming
>> from 2.0.36 it is a huge change, and as you say it may take lots of new
>> rpm files to ever use the new kernels.
>
>Well, it's not such a big step -- there's lots of new stuff, but almost
>everything should keep working without change. You do need those handful
>of new RPMs though.
>
>
>Hamish
hola amigos,
i've seen many opinions now on this list as to the new kernel. i have a
question that lingers in my mind though...if the system i already have
installed works ok (no matter what kernel/distribution i use), is there a
valid reason (other than experimentation) why i should use the new kernel?
i think probably not but i'd like to get other perspectives. thanks in
advance for your input.
73 de rick, hr2kos
