On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 14 Apr, Gerd wrote:
>
> > But older versions, eg. 1.33, did? Thats really estonishing since I
> > do not know a good reason why the net-tools developers should
> > leave the AX.25 support out in higher versions.
> > I'd suggest contacting either Phil Blundell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the
> > maintainer of the net-tools, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Co-
> > Maintainer).
>
> There isn't a lot of interest or knowledge of amateur radio protocols
> outside of this circle. I can cite many examples of amateur radio being
> overlooked in the mainstream development circles because it is "niche",
> or "boring" or "ugly". Some of these criticisms are valid in a global
> context. You can't expect everyone to be interested :) If we want
> anything done we will have to do it ourselves.
While the abovementioned is generally true I would like to point out that
Philip in fact seemed really interested in receiving patches for the ham
protocols. Heck, he even posted a message to this mailing list a while
back...
Again, I use 1.50 and everything works fine for me. I don't use ROSE so I
don't know the situation there, but I'm sure Philip will be pleased to
receive any patches.
--
--... Tomi Manninen / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ...--
