Linux-Hardware Digest #257, Volume #13 Tue, 18 Jul 00 09:13:08 EDT
Contents:
SCSI timing out? (Mike)
Re: mpeg capture from video capture card (Steve Martin)
Re: Lost LILO needs to be reconfigured...please help! ("albert")
Problems with Promise PDC20267 RAID Controller ("Jon Morby")
hdd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Lost LILO needs to be reconfigured...please help! (Anita Lewis)
Re: @Home w/ Mandrake 6.5 and SMC 2202 USB Ethernet Adapter (Thomas Kochak)
Re: @Home w/ Mandrake 6.5 and SMC 2202 USB Ethernet Adapter (Thomas Kochak)
Soundcard Problems. (root)
Re: Tape Drives - how do you backup? + HELP ("Karl E. Jorgensen")
Logitech pilot combo: in search of 3 button mouse for serial port (Guy Maskall)
Re: CPU temperature (Auto Cat +++ Auto Cat)
Re: dual cpu mobo's (Ian Mortimer)
HP tape surestore dat40i ? (Sebastian Kloska)
Promise RAID is possible ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SCSI timing out?
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:02:33 GMT
Hello,
I posted a question earlier, but I thought I'd try again with the
logging I'm now seeing. (Didn't know all the install logging went to a
vt.) For context, this is a machine with an on-board Adaptec AIC7896
chipset, talking to two IBM Ultrastar LVD disks. The motherboard has
two on-board connectors, one Ultra Wide, and one Ultra2/LVD
When Mandrake attempts to load the AIC7xxx module, I get the following
logged:
aborting command due to timeout pid0 SCSI0 channel0 id0 lun0
(then another line with a series of thing, all set to 0)
bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0
host 0 channel 0 reset (pid 0) timed out - trying harder
I get that over and over again until I reboot.
Then after a soft reboot, I get (from the SCSI bios on startup)
"FATAL ERROR: Wide negtiation failed. Please check your SCSI cable!
STOP!"
A hard reboot gets rid of that error, and the system seems to work with
other OS's. Any suggestions? It almost sounds like the SCSI driver is
tickling the Ultra Wide connector, which is unused, and ignoring the
Ultra2/LVD connector, which the two drives are connected to.
help!
--
Mike
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: mpeg capture from video capture card
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 05:17:44 -0400
blowfish wrote:
> Yes, broadcast 2000 is really neat.
>
> Try it with multi SMP clusters. You'll love it.
*Sigh*
Actually, BC2000 is the reason I'm saving up for an SMP mobo.
------------------------------
From: "albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Lost LILO needs to be reconfigured...please help!
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:23:55 +0100
Thank you for the help you've given
Fortunately for me, nothing terrible happened, and when I booted with the
rescue disk from Red Hat, it must have fixed something because the optioins
are set as before. I took a look at lilo.conf and it's similar to what
chem-r-us wrote. But for some reason, gnome isn't working very stable, and
even rebooted on me when I was trying to install staroffice 5.1.
Question?
Although this as been answered here sometimes, how can I change the
resolution on my desktop to 1024*768 @ 85Mhz ? Whenever gnome starts, it
jumps to the 1200*1024 and I have to do ctrl + alt + -, to decrease the
virtual size. I edited the x11/xf86config file, and commented with #
anything above 1024*768, but that didn't work. also, running XF86CONFIG
didn't help.
------------------------------
From: "Jon Morby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Promise PDC20267 RAID Controller
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:43:54 +0100
I'm trying to get one of the new Fastrak/100 ATA RAID controllers working
under 2.4.0-test4 ...
After much fiddling and searching of faq's I've managed to get the kernel to
see the controller by adding append="ide4=0x9800,0x9c02 ide5=0xa000,0xa402"
to my lilo.conf but it now sees the drives as seperate drives, even though
they're configured as a stripe on the controller ...
I get
Jul 18 09:50:00 tango kernel: Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision:
6.31
Jul 18 09:50:00 tango kernel: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO
modes; override with idebus=xx
Jul 18 09:50:00 tango kernel: PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
Jul 18 09:50:00 tango kernel: PIIX4: chipset revision 1
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs
later
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS
settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS
settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: PDC20267: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 78
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: PDC20267: chipset revision 2
Jul 18 09:50:01 tango kernel: PDC20267: not 100% native mode: will probe
irqs later
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: keyboard: Timeout - AT keyboard not present?
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: keyboard: Timeout - AT keyboard not present?
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: PDC20267: ROM enabled at 0xe9000000
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: PDC20267: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary
MASTER Mode Secondary MASTER Mode.
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: PDC20267: neither IDE port enabled (BIOS)
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: onboard version of chipset, pin1=1
pin2=2
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 98
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: chipset revision 1
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs
later
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: ide2: BM-DMA at 0xb400-0xb407, BIOS
settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 99
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: chipset revision 1
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: HPT366: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs
later
Jul 18 09:50:02 tango kernel: ide3: BM-DMA at 0xc000-0xc007, BIOS
settings: hdg:DMA, hdh:pio
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: hda: ST36531A, ATA DISK drive
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: hdg: Maxtor 91152D8, ATA DISK drive
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: hdi: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: hdk: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: ide3 at 0xb800-0xb807,0xbc02 on irq 18
Jul 18 09:50:03 tango kernel: ide4 at 0x9800-0x9807,0x9c02 on irq 16
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: ide5 at 0xa000-0xa007,0xa402 on irq 16 (shared
with ide4)
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hda: 12706470 sectors (6506 MB) w/128KiB
Cache, CHS=840/240/63, UDMA(33)
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdg: 22510656 sectors (11525 MB) w/256KiB
Cache, CHS=22332/16/63, (U)DMA
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdi: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB
Cache, CHS=148945/16/63
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdk: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB
Cache, CHS=148945/16/63
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: Partition check:
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango automount[570]: using kernel protocol version 3
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 >
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdg: [PTBL] [1401/255/63] hdg1 hdg2 < hdg5 >
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdi: hdi1 < hdi5 >
Jul 18 09:50:04 tango kernel: hdk: hdk1 < hdk5 >
..... at startup
I would have expected it to see just one 153740 Mb partition ...
This is on an ABIT BP-6 mobo, dual 533 celery ....
Any help gratefully received!
[root@tango /root]# cat /proc/pci
PCI devices found:
Bus 0, device 0, function 0:
Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev
3).
Master Capable. Latency=32.
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe0000000 [0xe3ffffff].
Bus 0, device 1, function 0:
PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (rev 3).
Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=136.
Bus 0, device 7, function 0:
ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ISA (rev 2).
Bus 0, device 7, function 1:
IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 1).
Master Capable. Latency=32.
I/O at 0xf000 [0xf00f].
Bus 0, device 7, function 2:
USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev 1).
IRQ 19.
I/O at 0x9000 [0x901f].
Bus 0, device 7, function 3:
Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 2).
Bus 0, device 13, function 0:
Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev
48).
IRQ 17.
Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=10.Max Lat=10.
I/O at 0x9400 [0x947f].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xeb020000 [0xeb02007f].
Bus 0, device 15, function 0:
RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20267 (rev 2).
IRQ 16.
Master Capable. Latency=32.
I/O at 0x9800 [0x9807].
I/O at 0x9c00 [0x9c03].
I/O at 0xa000 [0xa007].
I/O at 0xa400 [0xa403].
I/O at 0xa800 [0xa83f].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xeb000000 [0xeb01ffff].
Bus 0, device 19, function 0:
Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 (rev
1).
IRQ 18.
Master Capable. Latency=120. Min Gnt=8.Max Lat=8.
I/O at 0xac00 [0xac07].
I/O at 0xb000 [0xb003].
I/O at 0xb400 [0xb4ff].
Bus 0, device 19, function 1:
Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 (#2)
(rev 1).
IRQ 18.
Master Capable. Latency=120. Min Gnt=8.Max Lat=8.
I/O at 0xb800 [0xb807].
I/O at 0xbc00 [0xbc03].
I/O at 0xc000 [0xc0ff].
Bus 1, device 0, function 0:
VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Riva TnT2 Ultra [NV5] (rev
17).
IRQ 16.
Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=5.Max Lat=1.
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe4000000 [0xe4ffffff].
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe6000000 [0xe7ffffff].
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hdd
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:45:59 GMT
have recently bought a new 13GB Fujitsu hd. my bios dont suport disks
over 8.5GB? (theres no update for the bios available) but i can
partition the whole disk with linux fdisk.
the partition table looks like this:
~20 MB /dev/hda1 /boot (ext2)
1000 MB /dev/hda2 /dosC (fat 32)
3000 MB /dev/hda3 / (ext2)
<extended (hda4)>
5000 MB /dev/hda5 /dosD (fat 32)
~4000 MB /dev/hda6 /dosE (fat 32)
the problem is that if i make hda6 as fat32 and formats it in win, the
partition gets 4GB and i can read it in win. but i cant mount it in
linux. So if i make the partition in linux and runs mkdosfs on it, it
only gets 2GB and i can mount it in both win and linux but only as 2GB.
so if i create it as ext2 in linux i can use the whole 4GB in linux.
but i cant use it in win as of the restrictions to fat in win.
so after alot of fiddleing i decided to make two 2GB partitions
instead. but then i couldnt format or mkdosfs on any of them?!
i get alitle anoyed since i can mount the 5GB partition. and i can use
the whole disk in win. and in linux if i use ext2.
any one knows if theres some hack or something for this? or any ideas
at all?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anita Lewis)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Lost LILO needs to be reconfigured...please help!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:12:15 GMT
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:23:55 +0100, albert wrote:
>Thank you for the help you've given
>
>Fortunately for me, nothing terrible happened, and when I booted with the
>rescue disk from Red Hat, it must have fixed something because the optioins
>are set as before. I took a look at lilo.conf and it's similar to what
>chem-r-us wrote. But for some reason, gnome isn't working very stable, and
>even rebooted on me when I was trying to install staroffice 5.1.
>Question?
>Although this as been answered here sometimes, how can I change the
>resolution on my desktop to 1024*768 @ 85Mhz ? Whenever gnome starts, it
>jumps to the 1200*1024 and I have to do ctrl + alt + -, to decrease the
>virtual size. I edited the x11/xf86config file, and commented with #
>anything above 1024*768, but that didn't work. also, running XF86CONFIG
>didn't help.
Edit /etc/X11/XF86Config in the Screen Section for the driver you are using.
In Modes put the desired resolution first in line and it will start up with
that as default. Be sure you make the change in the section for the color
depth you are using, or just change them all if you use different color
depths. You may find that it goes into a virtual using 1200 x 1024, in
which case you can add a line that says Virtual 1024 768 (no x in that). I
am not sure if that still happens with X, but it used to be that it assumed
a virtual of the highest resolution listed.
Anita
------------------------------
From: Thomas Kochak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @Home w/ Mandrake 6.5 and SMC 2202 USB Ethernet Adapter
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:14:41 GMT
Is it AT&T@Home or is it a differant service?
AJ wrote:
> I have been unable to find any information about how to configure my @Home
> cable internet to work under Linux Mandrake 6.5 (RedHat 6.0).
>
> My ethernet card is the SMC 2202 USB External Adapter. Does anyone know
> if this is even supported under Linux?
>
> Thanks, AJ
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Thomas Kochak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @Home w/ Mandrake 6.5 and SMC 2202 USB Ethernet Adapter
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:15:19 GMT
Does it use static IP adressing or DHCP addressing?
AJ wrote:
> I have been unable to find any information about how to configure my @Home
> cable internet to work under Linux Mandrake 6.5 (RedHat 6.0).
>
> My ethernet card is the SMC 2202 USB External Adapter. Does anyone know
> if this is even supported under Linux?
>
> Thanks, AJ
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.mandrake,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Soundcard Problems.
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:15:20 GMT
Dear Group
I have a problem here with sound which is driving me insane..! Has
anyone managed to get any sound from a Trident soundcard using alsa
drivers or any others for that matter. The reason I ask is that I have
a Trident addonics sv 750 soundcard which under kernel 2.2.14-15mdk is
detected by sndconfig but that reports that the card is not supported
but I should try alsa-project..! I tried alsa-drivers with the -lib
-utils-0.5.8 which required the 2.2.16 kernel which i've clean installed
at least 10 times but as yet no joy. I've done all the usual things
like enable sound support only in the kernel, setup a module in the
kernel and even selected the option to install a trident driver for the
4DWave DX. Nothing seems to work. Infact it gets worse. Once I've
updated the kernel to 2.2.16, I can run sndconfig but get the following
message:
' You don't seem to be running a kernel with modular sound enabled '
Well I think I am. Sound support is enabled every time. It works OK
until I do the update then everything goes pear shaped - a bit like my
head at the moment. :o)
I've tried using the 2.4test kernel but again, no joy. Any ideas..?
Many thanks
Martin Kelly - Registered Linux User
------------------------------
From: "Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tape Drives - how do you backup? + HELP
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 11:40:15 +0100
Don't forget that tar "pads" to the tar block size, whereas files in
your file systems will take some multiple of 512 bytes (fs block size).
And if you set the tar block size to 8Kb, then a file will take *at
least* 8Kb.
Perhaps that can account for it?
Just my 2 p's worth
Karl E. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tabascox wrote:
>
> Hey DAT friends,
>
> I have a DDS 2 and I cannot store all the 4GB I want in a DDS2 tape.
> here are my commands:
>
> mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind
> mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk 8192
> mt -f /dev/nst0 datcompression 1
> tar cpMvl -b 16 -f /dev/nst0 /home
> mt -f /dev/nst0 eject
>
> actually "du /home" gives 3.6 GB (most files are gz or bz2) but around
> 3.2GB the tape
> ends and I have to feed the driver with another tape.
> Am I mistaking the block size ???
>
> Thanks
>
<snip>
------------------------------
From: Guy Maskall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Logitech pilot combo: in search of 3 button mouse for serial port
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:57:10 +0100
I'm after a mouse for linux (redhat 6.1 with kernel 2.2.16) with 3
buttons for connection to the serial port (no ps/2 socket, y'see).
I'm considering a logitech pilot mouse combo. Now ... I understand that
this is available as a serial device, can anyone offer confirmation that
this is a 'proper' serial mouse, rather than a ps/2 mouse with a
ps/2-serial adaptor? I'm aware, from '/usr/sbin/mouseconfig' that a
"logitech 3 button firstmouse (serial)" is an option listed. I also
gather, from logitech's website that the pilot mouse combo is a
firstmouse mouse. This sounds encouraging from the 'will it work'
perspective. However ... I've checked out the linux hardware
compatibility database website and there was a review there that said
the mouse worked great *but* they hadn't tested it on the serial port
and another (an anonymous) review that said they were trying to connect
it to the serial port and it wasn't being detected!
Can anyone shed any light on whether this mouse can be connected to the
serial port and made to work under linux?
Thanks for your time, Guy.
------------------------------
From: Auto Cat +++ Auto Cat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CPU temperature
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:15:53 -0700
If you ignore the temperature, you are a real computer player.
Please beware of burnt out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Auto Cat +++ Auto Cat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Although Intel places thermal diode in its P2 and P3, no one will
> > complain that the core temperature is different from the data sheet.
> > The temperature sensor is used to provide info for overclocking.
>
> Really?
>
> Because my health-monitoring hardware is disabled if I overclock my
> CPU. Seems somewhat counterintuitive, but maybe that's just Tyan's
> way of avoiding warranty calls caused by raving idiots.
>
> --
> Eric P. McCoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> "Dude... my hands are huge. They can touch anything but themselves...
> oh, wait."
------------------------------
From: Ian Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dual cpu mobo's
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:27:27 +0000
Thanks for the replies,
I hadn't seen the anandtech site before - lots of reading to do (with
more questions later :) )
Rgds,
Ian.
Ian Mortimer wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> My old P133 is getting a bit tired now and I wan't to build myself a
> shiny new one based around 2x700Mhz Pentium III's and a SCSI disk.
>
> I've been looking at the motherboards suitable (very hard to find info
> on dual boards isn't it ?) and it seems that the Asus P2B-D is quite a
> popular choice BUT it's looking a little dated now and I was wondering
> if there are any better (ie 133 FSB) boards for the above setup ? (not
> too worried about overclocking - stability, features and at least 1xISA
> slot are my main priorities)
>
> Two more little questions:
>
> 1) Is onboard SCSI a good thing or is more trouble than it's worth ?
> 2) Can FCPGA chips operate in SMP or should I stick to Slot 1 and the BX
> chipset ?
>
> Rgds,
>
> Ian.
------------------------------
From: Sebastian Kloska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HP tape surestore dat40i ?
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:33:08 +0200
Simple question
Does anyone work with the HP surestore dat40i (DDS4) tape under RedHat
6.1 ?
Any complains ?
thanks
Sebastian
-- =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
Dr. Sebastian Kloska; MPI of Molecular Plant Physiology; 14476 Golm,
Germany;
Am M=FChlenberg 1; Fon: +49 (331) 567 8208; Fax: +49 (331)
567 8250;
http://www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/leute/kloska.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Promise RAID is possible
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:33:55 GMT
Hi,
As far as I can tell (I don't have one myself),
the promise FastTrak 66 works like this: It's, in
the end, just an ata66 card, but has a bios that
enables a real-mode driver so the booting system
sees the raid-array as one drive. As soon as
Windows boots, the real-mode drivers are thrown
out and the windows drivers kick in. So surely it
shouldn't be too difficult to do this in Linux,
as you can access the drives in the RAID simply
through hda and hdb ... it sounds like a
new 'format' for md to recognise? That would make
it possible for you to run the whole system off a
software raid (lilo uses the bios so it CAN use
the on-board software of the fasttrak66).
(or is it me -> is there a way to load your
kernel off a software RAID?)
Come to think if it you could build this setup by
putting such a raid bios on an old network card
bootrom ......
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
