On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> DT nodes should use the more specific adi,adxl345 and adi,adxl346
> compatible values instead. As the ADXL346 is backward-compatible with
> the ADXL345, ADXL346 nodes must list both adi,adxl346 and adi,adxl345,
> in that order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt
> index 9f41d05be3be..757e42510517 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt
> @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ adi,adt7475         +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C
>  adi,adt7476          +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C
>  adi,adt7490          +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C
>  adi,adxl345          Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer
> -adi,adxl346          Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer
> -adi,adxl34x          Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer
> +adi,adxl346          Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer 
> (backward-compatibility value "adi,adxl345" must be listed too)

I'd rather drop 346 because there is no compatible for that one anywhere.
No need to resend, I can fix it here...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to