> >> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it encounters
> >> it in a .dts.
> >
> > Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it is
> > not different from 345 (which is fine by me).
> 
> To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be omitted
> from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching.

Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like
i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live
with it :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to