On 3/2/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Yonah Russ wrote:

> I'm confused... is there any parent that wants their kids to freely and
> easily access pornography? Halevai the UN would treat pornography like
they
> treat nuclear weapons.

I am confused... is there any adult in this country who wants to be
fingerprinted to be able to check his email or chat in an adult chat
group (perhaps looking for a mate, perhaps not using very academic
language all the time - i.e. without resorting to Victorian code along
the lines of 'I wish I could tickle you softly' when someone means
something entirely different, yes) ?


Someone with nothing to hide probably doesn't care. On the other hand, if
their afraid that someone could find out what they're doing, maybe they
shouldn't be doing it? Besides, I don't see any reason why the resulting
identification system has to be personally traceable.

By the way, your kids *do* go to
the beach from time to time (without wearing blindfolds) ? Or not ?


My kids are under 4 years old so they don't surf the web or the waves ;) but
I don't really want them to be surfing porn sites when they grow up.


Sorry for asking, there is no need to answer, I'm just mumbling to
myself. Of course I fully endorse setting up firewalls and content
filters of any kind you wish at *your* premises. At a cost.


That's what people do now and it is less than effective. If you are worried
about the investments necessary by the ISP's, I say start taxing porn users
and take the money to pay the ISPs for their work. If this country can tax a
$12k car into a 120k NIS car, they can tax porn users (and cigarette smokers
while they're at it).

And, g*d forbid the UN treat p0rn like they treat nuclear weapons,
because if their treatment of Iran and Iraq and a couple of other
countries (like NK) in the last ~17 years is any measure, then it would
mean p0rn would be a minor misdemeanor ranked about equal to farting in
public, to be punished with a pat on the back and the extraction of a
promise not to do it again.


I stand corrected- Halevai they would treat it as they should treat nuclear
weapons.
Yonah


Peter P.


Reply via email to