On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:32:51PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote: > 2009/2/26 Tzafrir Cohen <tzaf...@cohens.org.il> > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:21:54PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote: > > > > > Why do you think OpenVZ might be better? Does it have a known > > > advantage in Asterisk hosting? > > > > Because your provider may be able to provide you basically the same > > resources for less money. So if OpenVZ is good enough for you: fine. > > You mean in case that the hosting provider provides the necessary > kernel modules in OpenVZ?
Kernel modules? What kernel modules? :-) (See the second part. Well, maybe this is more for future installations than for now) > Is there any technical obstacle preventing an interested hosting > provider from offering the required modules in Xen guest kernels? > As for the cost - as far as I'm aware OpenVZ costs the same as Xen > hosting at VPSLink and my personal experience with openvz/virtuozo > hosting was that it's a bit limited near the edges. OpenVZ consumes less resources. Hence you can use more instances per server. Hence it costs less. VPSLink seem to price them the same. Most others don't from my previous searches. -- Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's tzaf...@cohens.org.il | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
