On 08/15/2011 11:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 22:19, Shachar Shemesh <shac...@shemesh.biz> wrote: >> I suggest that you tap the existing resources, that clearly document the >> reasons behind both decisions, rather than assume (incorrectly, I might >> add) stuff about it, and then fling it around like it was a curse-word. >> > > I meant to be harsh, not offensive. What did I assume incorrectly?
Emacs. I believe none of the people present there ever used it. I > didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to > here (your site): > http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.html > As for the actual criticism, when you've shown that you understood WHY the decisions were taken (documented in my blog), then you can make constructive suggestions how to make it better. Until then, you are just a joker who throws stones from afar. For the record, Shai Berger also did not like some of the decisions. He asked to be attend personally, got his wish, made his case, got focused responses, and was satisfied that it couldn't have been done better. It is possible that things could be done better, but uninformed criticism like yours shows little more than ignorance, and does little to get us there (assuming it's possible). Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd. http://www.lingnu.com _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
