On 4 Nov 1999, Dag Brattli wrote:
>time already much better and more correct! So yes, fewer people will be
>able to debug the code, but hopefully no one will have to.
Although I personally have no interest i OBEX I'd like to say 'Keep up the
good work' to you and the rest of the OBEX-ppl. Your conclusions on the C
"implementation" of OBEX are correct, it might work, but it's not great.
>Python is _very_ easy to read and write, and executes the code _more_ than
>fast enough. The bottleneck will definitively be something related to the IO
>activity in IrDA anyway (9600-4Mbps). Have you ever looked at Python?
I think part of the problem is right here..
I'm myself not very familiar with Python, I've only had to deal with it once,
when I simply installed it because something else required it..
It's a language of some sort, but I don't know any details. And I also don't
know what to do with a Python library, and if/how that library would be
interoperable with some other language.. I guess I'll have a look at Python
someday.. :)
//Peter
--
irc: CareBear\ tel: +46-40-914420
irl: Peter Stuge gsm: +46-705-783805
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
