>
> > Why do you sound so negative? Python makes it possible to implement OBEX in
>
> Negative? More like frustrated. You are implementing what's obviously
> a library that should be incorporated in other programs in a language that
> requires an interpreter and a run-time environment. Not to mention that
> re-implementing it will introduce a new set of bugs, or that the run-time
> environment of Python will itself carry with it its own bugs.
You are sounding negative.
1. as pointed out you don't have to use it
2. you can just treat it as a reference implementation and reimplement it
if you like.
3. Many programs are written in python and work very well without bugs
4. It is not hard to learn (easier than say perl as it has a cleaner design)
5. run time overhead does not matter when you are talking to a slow device
like IrDA
6. "re-implementing it will introduce a new set of bugs" - this is to replace
something in C so buggy it didnt work, and we are assured that the new version
works well.
Justin
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
