[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Shared library linkage brings you into the same grey area that binary > only kernel modules fall into, this means it's risky and this is > almost certainly how the GCC team views this situation. But how much work would it require to do so? If your theoretical vendor of closed-source compiler backends were to believe that a shared lib of the GCC frontend would be legal, surely they'd just make it shared themselves, then use it as such? It's hardly a effective preventative measure. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Jonathan Walther
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... David Woodhouse
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Nix
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integr... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Linus Torvalds
- if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how a... Martin MaD Douda
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro