-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

If the shared library is under GPL (not LGPL) that
isn't a problem.  No?

On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Because this allows proprietary software vendor X to write
> closed-source compiler backend Y using GCC to provide the
> front end.  If it never becomes a shared library, this sort
> of thing cannot happen.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOba6OsK9HT/YfGeBAQEWlwP/TSHBmU93Yu4S2LkNxtOHGKZF21+zOchb
3Ado5qzdoCiXEXznWWlZWTpSbbPr2VvNxfO8D0QnHEQmZfMV+RddVQbFt3KIwAmz
cv7Ws33rmfHfwjUSgpETxcc9HmJO1NU4LNo2XWXzRe2JCCdVCrmBOSQjQ1EXGzCa
I4eLZcV0QNg=
=jxhk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to