> On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The problem is most definitely NOT X as I experienced the exact same
> > problems and reported it to l-k yesterday; and my box has no trace of X on
> > it. gcc and grep take it down though.
>
> I have been running 2.4.0-test9-pre2 for some time now and have not experienc
ed
> any deadlock or shared memory problem, except for one instance.
Byron - test9-pre2 was fine for me (bar that deadlock after 2 hours idle
thing), it's test9-pre6 that seems to really badly blow goats.
d
--
Daniel Stone
Kernel Hacker (or at least has aspirations to be)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dustpuppy.ods.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
