Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

[safemode]

Ok, compiling using a cvs of X i got a couple hours ago,  I'm just
wondering what the average segment number is for SHM on an X session
that has been up for a while ....  i'll get back with any sort of info
on if the SHM problem has been solved with this latest CVS or if it
continues to look like a kernel SHM problem.  So far though,
2.4.0-test8-vm3 is handling the problem Quite well as opposed to test9,
which died in 2 hours upon booting ...and it didn't have the added
stress of compiling X.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/