On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial > > compiler, with all the consequences I said. > > And didnt you write something called pgcc once. Oh yes, of course while providing full binary compatibility. You can even mix & match objects from gcc and pgcc and agcc, no kidding. No distribution that used pgcc was ever binary incompatible to any other distribution, which is the point you keep ignoring. > *PLONK* No need to get personal ;) I had hoped you could keep to *technical* reasoning, though :( -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Ulrich Drepper
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? John Anthony Kazos Jr.
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Larry McVoy
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Alexander Viro
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Kim Shepherd
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier