> Well, the glibc-2.1 on redhat disks acted differently than the glibc-2.1 > in the cvs repository or on the ftp servers, but that does not mean that > the actual glibc code is the culprit. Again, please read what I actually > wrote, not only the parts that others have quoted. Did you EVER looked at the differences ?? Looking at your statement probably not. So do so before making these kind of idiotic statements. Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? jeff millar
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? braun
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Ulrich Drepper
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? John Anthony Kazos Jr.