On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> OTOH, [EMAIL PROTECTED] might get pressed into not doing incompatible
> changes,
We're doing no such thing.
If we did this sort of thing, he would have been pressed into releasing
glibc 2.2 in time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] did have some influence on choosing the
glibc for 7.0 though, so we're confident no major changes will be
necessary.
> This might not
> mean anything, however, since redhat was most probably ignoring their
> own people (e.g. from cygnus) who I really believe didn't support their
> decision.
The opposite is the case. They didn't want to have to support a dead
branch (2.1/2.95).
> Redhat might just hack their libc to be redhat-7.0 compatible
> later...
That's what we'll do if any incompatible changes will be necessary -
fortunately glibc supports versioning.
LLaP
bero
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
