> > Isn't this completely broken? I mean, it wont detect the others at all. It > > will leave CC="" if gcc272 or kgcc are there. > > Yes. Sorry I' too selfish today ;) Your version seems more accurate to me. I've dropped Miquel's version into my tree. He simply side steps the entire 'which which' issue and uses scripts/kwhich Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ca... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ca... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedule... Horst von Brand
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sch... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedule... Jeff Garzik
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sch... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedule... Pavel Machek
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sch... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight f... Ben Collins
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfig... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ca... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedule... Petri Kaukasoina
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight f... Peter Samuelson
- [PATCH] further ruminations on 2.2.18-pre13 $(CC) defini... Peter Samuelson
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. ... Mitch Adair
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. ... Olivier Galibert
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre13, drm without agp Peter Osterlund