On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:

> Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a
> > particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the
> > codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge
> > work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that.
> 
> Is there any _real_ gcc alternative in sight?

pcc might become such, but I'm not subscribing to that job.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to