On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote: > Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > [...] > > > Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a > > particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the > > codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge > > work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that. > > Is there any _real_ gcc alternative in sight? pcc might become such, but I'm not subscribing to that job. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catf... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Horst von Brand
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Jeff Garzik
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Pavel Machek
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Ben Collins
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Petri Kaukasoina
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Peter Samuelson