Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a > particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the > codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge > work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that. Is there any _real_ gcc alternative in sight? Just wondering... -- Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catf... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Horst von Brand
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Jeff Garzik
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Pavel Machek
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Ben Collins
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Petri Kaukasoina
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alan Cox