Richard Henderson wrote: > Frankly, I didn't even consider C++ ABI compatibility with other > Linux vendors, since I think that's a losing proposition until > everyone is using gcc3. We were _already_ incompatible, since > there are a mix of egcs and gcc versions involved. C++ ABI breaking: SuSE managed to break the VShop application in an entierly insane way between releases 6.1 and 6.2 - they stiupid did recompile the libstdc++ with a new compiler and didn't even bother to increment the binary version of this library!!!! At RedHat at least they know what they are changing... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Stefan Traby
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Richard Henderson
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Harald Dunkel
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Michael Peddemors
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alexander Viro
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alan Cox
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Jesse Pollard