Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > Obviously redhat did and does a lot of similar braindamage, which could be > called "bugs" (no version of perl on redhat cd's really worked correctly > for example). > Again, the choice redhat did can not be construed as being some mistake by > some guy or a group of guys. It was a deliberate decision. And a "deliberate decision" by a "bunch of guys" (which by some freak accident of fate just so happens includes several of the lead people on the involved software projects) can't ever be right, or even just be a honest mistake. Noooo, it _has_ to be sabotage, planned and executed by His Evilness Himself. -- Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Richard Henderson
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Harald Dunkel
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Michael Peddemors
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alexander Viro
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alan Cox
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Jesse Pollard
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki